Howdy,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 PbPied@aol.com wrote:
> As a member of the PC that has been enjoined against public discussion
> regarding the deliberations of the Committee, I can't tell you what our
> procedure was for checking the car. But I will tell you that is was well
> thought out and agreed upon by all the members of the PC. The disposition
> of that protest speaks for itself.
I have no input regarding the protest or its outcome.
That said, the above statement disturbs me.
Why should a protest committee's thoughts not be allowed to be public?
Are they embarrased about what they were thinking? Trying to hide
ignorance?
I suspect not. More likely I suspect is an attempt to dodge controversy.
In fact, I bet most of us could learn a hell of a lot based on what the
protest committee went through (_any_ protest committee). And the
controversy is going to happen anyway.
I for one would like PC decisions and the reasoning behind them to be more
public. Given posts I've made about the one PC I was on, I suspect that
opinion doesn't surprise many people... :-)
Mark
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|