To: | evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com (Evolution Discussion), |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Stock shock rules rewrite? |
From: | TeamZ06@aol.com |
Date: | Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:29:54 EST |
In a message dated 1/12/02 8:21:16 AM Central Standard Time, awhollis@swbell.net writes: > PS: Sipe, you dirty dog! > Hey, I only asked the SEB to clarify the wording and eliminate some conflicts. The moral of the story is: Be careful what you ask the SEB for, you just might get more than you wanted. Mark /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Springs? Nah. (was Shock Rule Re-write), PbPied |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules, Gail/Sid deLeon |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Stock Shock Rules rewrite?, Dave Hardy |
Next by Thread: | Re: Stock Shock Rules rewrite?, Smokerbros |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |