Mmmmm, I smell costs. Cameras that don't move don't nearly as much as ones that
move. Oh, and add robotic control? $$ Add a few more dollars for something
strung on a wire or a track (think Olympic Speed skating or Running), and
you'll really have a "fun" budget.
I hate to paint an ugly picture, but like Rich, just trying to be a realist.
Stuffing :15 or :30 spots would generate more "ROI" than buying a full 23
minutes. Now you could co-op the cost with Hoosier/Peavey/GEEZ, etc. and have
some logos in the background of said spots.
Matt Murray
mattm@optonline.net
Copyright 2001, Matthew D. Murray. Permission to reproduce these words
on the list explicitly granted.
----- Original Message -----
Chas wrote:
> The camera angles need to be done well. There
> needs to be one that shows the starts and finishes, and one that
> shows how fast one car is gaining on the other. At the NASCAR race at
Sears
> Point, they have had a camera suspended from a cable from Turn 11 up to
> Turn 1. That one, off to one side, would be great...
And Mr. Thacher inquired:
Does this thing move back and forth?
Ben
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/wilma/autox
|