Never mind, I caught up on your messages.
KeS
>From: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Kevin Stevens" <kevin_stevens@hotmail.com>
>To: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com, autox@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?'
>Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:15:27 -0800
>
> >The rules mean that on a regular basis, the car must be made legal enough
> >to pass whatever inspection procedures your state/province requires of
>you.
>
>To what end? If the tacit understanding is that the majority of
>competitors
>won't compete in that configuration, what is the point of the rule?
>
> >If, after that is accomplished (of which your plates are proof) you
> >choose to defeat these systems, that is entirely your affair. The SCCA is
> >not in the business of enforcing the emissions laws, nor is it capable of
> >doing so.
>
>So have a bunch of TireRack license plates printed up and do away with the
>farce. One of the sorest points of SM is that we have yet another Street
>Prepared-ish class, and STILL haven't addressed the issue of street-legal
>cars.
>
>KeS
>_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
|