To: | <dg50@daimlerchrysler.com>, <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?' |
From: | "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:39:36 -0600 |
dg50@daimlerchrysler.com writes: > The rules mean that on a regular basis, the car must be made legal enough > to pass whatever inspection procedures your state/province requires of you. Exactly WHY should that requirement be in the rules, when it's not in the rules for ANY other Solo II class? That's the question that nobody has wanted to answer. Jay |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Cats and SM, dg50 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: SM 'Street Legal?' Now: cats, Linnhoff, Eric |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', dg50 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', dg50 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |