I will happily address this issue in public!
You say: "Debate, educated discourse and discussion, not name
calling please."
You said, in your response to Karen Kraus' message: "This message
is truly offensive. . . . . . .degrade. . . . . .abhorent. . . . . .
.degrade. . . . .
ignorant. . . . . .insulting. . . . . . .people who don't like change. .
. . .
tear them down. . . . . . ."
If this is an example of debate, educated discourse & discussion,
then I am truly poorly educated. Instead, it makes me wish for a return
to the days when David Stamm was posting to the list.
Oftimes, folks post personal, private responses to either save the
entire list from further discussion on something of limited interest, or
to save the initial poster further embarrasment.
My internet service provider can be reached by phone at 419-937-2097,
or at: sysop@friendlynet.com
Roger Johnson (Ohio)
JM> Ok, enough already. If those of you who differ on the issues of
JM>classes want to attack me on the issue, do so in the public forum where I
JM>posted originally and not this covert private attack email garbage. I have
JM>now been sent emails privately from 4 different individuals, most of which
JM>not only differ in opinion but resort to name calling and attacks. This is
JM>not appropriate and if it continues I will inform your ISP of the emails
JM>that your email address is being used inappropriately.
JM> Debate, educated discourse and discussion, not name calling please.
JM>
JM>John Moore
JM>"I dont want the statistics, just the truth!"
|