I wouldn't mind coming in second to Daddio. Just how win-needy does one
have to be? I certainly do think the Type R is classed better in DS than
GS...but then, G.H., you've heard that before. :-)
--Pat Kelly
Ghsharp@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/7/00 8:56:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, psosborn@gte.net
> writes:
>
> > Yep, you hit the nail on the head, GH. It doesn't seem broken to me.
> > Besides, under the proposed structure, how many people want to go out and
> > buy the car for the class, if you can find one? In D Stock, you would have
> > to spend more than twice the money for a Type R, assuming you can find one,
> > as you would for an ACR Neon, of which there are plenty to be found...Not my
> > idea of keeping racing costs down...
> >
> > Phil O.
>
> Why assume that the Type R would be the car to have instead of the Neon?
> The only place Daddio was slower than a Type R last year was the Wendover
> Pro. I was at that event, and the course was a foot-to-the-floor drag race to
> the far end, as far removed as possible from a Nationals Solo II course. No
> question that a Type R in the hands of a good driver could maintain that
> opening advantage through the rest of the course. I would think that the
> Type R contingent would be concerned as to whether Daddio will show up
> at Topeka in 2001 in an ACR.
>
> GH
|