autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes)

To: jcgz3@hotmail.com, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes)
From: Ghsharp@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 20:46:37 EDT
In a message dated 7/7/00 7:06:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, jcgz3@hotmail.com 
writes:

> I personally don't think all cars would benefit from lot's of camber.  Cars
> with double wishbone suspension don't need as much camber (ie, the wheels
> don't tip as much), so cars like the Miata and Type R excel with hardly any
> camber, and I'd wager they wouldn't be quicker, maybe even slower with 2 deg
> of camber :-).  ...Curious to see if the CSP miata's run much camber....
> ---JCG

You're correct...not all cars would benefit, but some certainly would and
therein lies the problem from a classing standpoint.

GH

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>