To: | <autox@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes) |
From: | "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Jul 2000 18:25:15 -0400 |
GH wrote: >>If your car has the capability of more camber than the spec >>allows, and your alignment bolts come loose during your runs, >>how do you prove you were legal on course when you get to >>impound? Boy is that true! I had to adjust the rear cams on my Supra twice at the Peru National Tour because they were out of alignment. Who knows what camber I was running. Supras (and Toyotas in general I guess) are notorious for the cams slipping. Kent Rafferty |
Previous by Date: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), TeamZ3 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Cl, Kent Rafferty |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), TeamZ3 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Stock class rules was (Re: Sequential Stock Classes), JCGZ3 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |