autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: The Ultimate BSP Vette(The info that u were probably looking 4)

To: Robert Glover <rob@f-body.org>, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: The Ultimate BSP Vette(The info that u were probably looking 4)
From: Rick Brown <rbrown7@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 22:01:18 -0800
In SS as much as you can get without squashing the frame rails.  Works out
to about 0.7 to 1 degree negative.
With BSP and the car lowered about 1.5 degrees.  More static negative hurts
braking so there is a driving style and course dependance.
--- Rick


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Glover [mailto:rob@f-body.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 7:27 PM
To: Rick Brown; autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: The Ultimate BSP Vette(The info that u were probably
looking 4)


From: "Rick Brown" <rbrown7@pacbell.net>


> I have run my C4 ZR-1 with both the early and late front suspension
> geometries.  The 88 and later zero scrup uses a longer lower control arm
and
> has more camber gain which I believe to be an advantage.  Other's
experience
> to the contrary may be due to dialing in too much static negative camber
> instead of using the camber gain.  The change to zero scrub makes for less
> kickback in the steering wheel when under full ABS in front which is
> probably the reason the factory went to it in the first place.

What do you consider to be the best camber setting for the front,
particularly on an early C4?

Rob



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>