> DG wrote:
>> All this does is provide a "legal" means of putting a boost
>> controller on an SP car.
> You might be naive enough to believe this is legal, but IMO it is a > direct
attempt to circumvent the intent of the SP rules and will be > shot down in a
protest.
Notice the quotes around the word "legal" Mark.
For the record, I had someone ask me what I thought of the idea a few months ago
(he had come up with the concept independantly of Farzaan) and I told him that
while it was by the letter of the rules "legal" it was obviously an attempt to
end-run another rule, and certainly counter to the spirit of the rules in
general - and I was rather emphatic that he not do this.
> Of course it will be a moot point once the highly praised "no
> exhaust changes before the cat" turbo car rule goes into effect.
"Highly praised"? Hardly. I understand that the SEB was bombarded with
complaints that the rule was unfair and unfounded. I would be very suprised if
the rule goes through after all the negative feedback they recieved.
DG
|