To: | James Franks <jimmble@adelphia.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: possible engine swap for TR6 |
From: | Ed McGuirk <emcguirk@optonline.net> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jun 2002 23:13:36 -0400 |
I often think about engine swaps that feature high boost and lots of aluminum. The TR6 is a great car but it's technology was not why I chose it. Ed McGuirk At 09:32 PM 6/20/2002 -0400, James Franks wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ed McGuirk" <emcguirk@optonline.net> > > > I stand corrected. > > > > I always get fascinated by high tech parts made out of unobtainium > > >HUH???? > >The TR6 motor is a HEAVY lump. Even the Gawd-awful heavy 2.3 I plan to >use weighs less. > >Jim |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: possible engine swap for TR6, James Franks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: 220 hp TR6 engine, R. Ashford Little II |
Previous by Thread: | Re: possible engine swap for TR6, James Franks |
Next by Thread: | Re: possible engine swap for TR6, Robert M. Lang |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |