can't imagine anyone being interested in buying a TR4 etc body if thats
priced accordingly to the TR6 body. IMHO the price for the TR6 shell is too
expensive keeping in mind that this sort of money buys you a complete decent
car. So think about what the price will be before you produce. Plus it
escapes my undestanding as to why BMH producs a MKIV Mini shell when you can
buy a MKV shell which is only different in minor details (i.e. seat belt
mounting points etc.) instead of producing a MKI shell or /and a van/pickup
shell. MKIV's have no collectors value whatsoever and are the sort of cars
that are up to grab for from free onwards.
Just my 2 whatever currency
Gernot
> ----------
> From: ArthurK101@aol.com[SMTP:ArthurK101@aol.com]
> Reply To: ArthurK101@aol.com
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 2:56 PM
> To: jonmac@ndirect.co.uk; triumphs@autox.team.net;
> Spitfires@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Triumph Panelwork
>
>
> John, how about a TR4/4A/5/250 body. My vote. Please. cheers.
> Art Kelly
>
>
> In a message dated 98-11-08 18:51:36 EST, jonmac@ndirect.co.uk writes:
>
> > I have just spent two days surrounded by four replacement bodies -
> > Spridget, MBG, Mk4 Mini and a TR6.
> > As many of you will know, these are available as complete
> > units through BMH and their agents or in component panel form.
> >
> > What I'm trying to determine, is what is the likely demand for other
> > similar assemblies OR component panels covering Spitfire / GT6 /
> > Herald and TR4/A?
> >
> > Anyone like to throw in their thoughts by describing the sort of panels
> > or part / complete structures they'd like to have IF they were
> > available?
> >
> > In the absence of a low response, I'll assume supply needs are broadly
> > satisfied.
> >
> > John Mac
> >
>
|