triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Smog (was SB-42)

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Smog (was SB-42)
From: Bschwartz@encad.com (Barry Schwartz)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:19:28 -0700
Shane writes:
    < snip  >
>Unfortunately, pollution control is not about making air cleaner for us and
>future generations (although a small minority do believe this), it is
>about money, pure and simple.
    <  snip  > 
***********************
And I will have to agree, based on personal experience, as well as
experiences of others.  That’s why I suggested to senator Kopp that to
quell the loss of income issue, that a charge for, call it whatever you
want, non-smog surcharge- of $20 every two years (just like the charge now)
for not having to go through all the bull s**t just to drive your car.
Even at $50 it's a bargain.  I don’t think too many people would mind
paying this fee.  It's certainly a lot less hassle, and frankly you'll pay
that and probably more when you have to go through the hassle!  At that
they could even make money, and I for one would be MUCH happier not having
to go through the increasingly troublsome smog check!!!


Barry Schwartz (San Diego, CA)

bschwartz@encad.com

1972 V6 Spit (daily driver)
1970 GT6+ (When I dont drive the Spit)
1970 Spitfire (project)
1973 Courier (parts hauler)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>