spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spridgets] Rust- proofing again

To: spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Rust- proofing again
From: <bjshov8@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:45:16 -0500
I was going to say that any list that refers to "rust proofing" and contains 
"WD-40" is probably flawed from the beginning.  But I haven't heard of any of 
the other products so maybe they don't do any rust proofing either.  I HAVE 
seen informal tests where people would take a batch of nails, coat them with 
different products, and stick them in the ground for awhile then come back and 
inspect them.  Invariably WD-40 is found to be very bad at rust proofing.  Of 
course it is usually found to be very bad at lubricating also.  They do have 
the very best PR however because their name is almost synonymous with rust 
proofing AND lubrication.  There are plenty of products on the market and 
available at any decent hardware or automotive store that will far excel at 
rust proofing and at lubrication.

I was at a machinist's house one time helping some students do some work on his 
Bridgeport mill for a high school project and I noticed 1 gallon cans of WD-40 
setting around.  Nobody is more set in their ways than an old machinist so I 
decided not to get into an argument about the merits or failings of WD-40.  
After awhile I saw how it was being used and maybe it works well for that.  He 
kept a small cup of WD-40 liquid next to the mill and a small brush.  He would 
dip the brush into the liquid and then apply it to the surfaces about to be 
milled, or to the cutters.  Maybe it works fine for that use.

I also remember reading a story about a company that manufactured handguns.  
The barrels screw into the frames, and at the shoulder at the end of the 
threads there is a big stress concentration.  Due to their metallurgy and other 
factors, they had a problem with stress corrosion leading to fracture, i.e. 
some of the barrels were breaking off.  They thought this was caused by a 
chemical in the WD40 so they stopped using it.  I know what stress corrosion is 
but it is fairly rare.



> So what you are saying then according to your list that the 63 Sprite is the 
>worst at rust proofing?
> 
> Chris 
> ---- Greg Higgins <g.h.higgins@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > The Canadian Army tested every rust-proofing product on the market, these 
>are
> > what they are, from best to the worst.
> > 
> > Product
> > Manufacturer
> > 
> > Formula 3000                                                      Corrosion
> > Free
> > 
> > WD-40                                                                WD-40
> > Product (Canada) Ltd
> > 
> > ACF-50                                                               Lear
> > Chemical Research Corp.
> > 
> > LPS-2                                                                LPS
> > Laboratories
> > 
> > Krown T-40                                                        Canadian
> > Krown Dealers Inc.
> > 
> > Rustcheck Dripless                                            Rust Check
> > Corp.
> > 
> > Corrosion Block                                                  Lear 
>Chemical
> > Research Corp.
> > 
> > Boeshield T-9                                                     The Boeing
> > Company
> > 
> > Rustcheck Red                                                  Rust Check
> > Corp
> > 
> > Greg Higgins
> > 63sprite
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation  $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/spridgets/bjshov8@tx.rr.com
_______________________________________________

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>