spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Postmortem on a 1275

To: pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re: Postmortem on a 1275
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:19:49 -0600
Cc: Spridgets@autox.team.net
I guess I wasn't clear.  Mine were sweat fit pins, not full-floating. 
They walked anyway.

--David Littlefield

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:58:36 -0800 "Paul Asgeirsson"
<pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> I guess I'm unfamiliar with building race engines, just long life 
> bullet
> proof ones!!  What I'm curious about is why would you go to a full 
> float
> piston in a 1275?  Is there an "Advantage" to getting more HP than a 
> fixed
> pin in a 1275?  So far, at least with the related experiences here, 
> it might
> have some durability  issues.  Cooper S rods were sweat fit pins.
> 
> Anyone?
> 
> Paul A
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <dmeadow@juno.com>
> To: <pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net>
> Cc: <thcollin@mtu.edu>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Postmortem on a 1275
> 
> 
> > I'd like to know what is going on, as well.  I just had exactly 
> this
> > happen on a 1275 using Mega pistons from Mini Mania and APT 
> prepped rods.
> >  The wrist pins walked and badly scored the cylinder walls in much 
> less
> > than 1500 miles (try 4 or 5).  So far we can't figure out why.  
> Why would
> > the wrist pins be undersized or the rod ends oversized?  The 
> machinist is
> > going to measure them and see what they are.
> >
> > Anyone have any first-hand experience with this?
> >
> > --David Littlefield
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:49:41 -0800 "Paul Asgeirsson"
> > <pasgeirsson@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> > > Wait a second here!  It doesn't say it was a 1098, but what else 
> has
> > > full
> > > floating wrist pins?  So now they want a 1275?  I'm confused on
> > > this
> > > article.  1275 has press fit pins in the rods.
> > >
> > > Teflon buttons on a 1098 are a typical cure for retaining wrist 
> pin
> > > clips,
> > > so why the search for a different style engine?  Am I missing
> > > something?
> > >
> > > Paul A




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>