To: | David Lieb <dbl@chicagolandmgclub.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: SUVs |
Date: | Sat, 07 Jan 2006 09:10:41 -0800 |
Cc: | Spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=no51qTkjmpxkL192656maLAdCS/xVyZjkcEHoZdF+1szQXaF50gwR4+9ofL7nVZv; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
References: | <0fdb7ed0156bf9dcb4b5e48f1ae37075@ocotillofield.net> <008601c613a2$0dccc0b0$6401a8c0@refisk> <005901c613a3$e5a942f0$c400a8c0@midget> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
David Lieb wrote: > There are very few road conditions that an SUV will handle > better or more safely than a GTi. SUV's. They bring to mind the Suzuki Samurai and the Isuzu Trooper and the findings of Consumer Reports. The magazine still has not lost a lawsuit! The magazine also reported that the NHSTA has found that SUV's pose a greater risk of turning over when cornering at high speeds. And that there is a greater chance of injury to other parties and more damage to other cars in an SUV-involved accident. Buster Evans |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|