| Subject: | Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:39:06 -0500 |
| Cc: | spridget list <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=js8yGU6Eg5sib5IJxorV+cR+8svWkBsk9lrbki4qQy2CnhSyasFo+wmkyFDRdNgl; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
| References: | <BAY0-SMTP02DBD2678E9B11512D9FF6AB2F0@phx.gbl> <008501c6119a$da533600$6500a8c0@dave> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) |
Not to mention the undercoating and dirt in the seam between the fender and rocker. jay fishbein wallingford, ct <http://home.ix.netcom.com/%7Etype79/> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~type79/ David Riker wrote: > This car may have never been retailed, but it has been used. Note the > sagging sun visors, yellowed back up lamp lenses, missing soft top, > and aftermarket roll bar. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Fw: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | In 2006...(Re: In 1951......), Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Fw: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |