| To: | Biff Jones <biffjones@erols.com>, spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275, lets add the 948 |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:37:03 GMT |
Apples and oranges. Not a stock application....
......any more than was my PO'd Vizardized 1340 with the VP3 cam, large intake
valves, 45DCOE, etc. which also got better mileage at 4K+ than at lower rpms.
All a matter of
max BMEP in accordance with cam profile, ALL other factors being equal and/or
remaining the same.
Cap'n. Bob '60 :{)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275, lets add the 948, owner-spridgets |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275, owner-spridgets |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Non-hypothetical question, 1098 vs. 1275, lets add the 948, owner-spridgets |
| Next by Thread: | valence paint, owner-spridgets |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |