RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?

spridgets

RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?

To:	JNBrashear@garverengineers.com, conan@intrex.net, spridgets@autox.team.net
Subject:	RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?
Date:	Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:42:37 GMT jB2CgKvf020483

Curtiss "Commando" = C-46, Jack.

Unlike the DC-3, it had a "relatively"
wide body for bulkier payloads. From everything I've read it was a rugged "can 
do" airplane but a tad short on HP. Evidently, It's engine out performance left 
a little to be desired I guess. :)

Cap'n Bob
Basic Frog

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?, owner-spridgets Re: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?, Unknown RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?, owner-spridgets RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?, Unknown <=

Previous by Date:	RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?, owner-spridgets
Next by Date:	RE: NLBC Old-Navy, owner-spridgets
Previous by Thread:	RE: P.S. Can anyone think of anything else we should obsess over?, owner-spridgets
Next by Thread:	re: engine run-in procedure, owner-spridgets
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]