Subject: | Re: License plates |
---|---|
Date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:43:53 -0700 |
Cc: | spridgets <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=Y3TDqKlHmRbiAoINijaqrYThvot5jtpt84CG01o9zfPpsIGupIyWeto5JGnCdXHG; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
References: | <410-220051042710612770@earthlink.net> |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
cfchrist@earthlink.net wrote: >also some states require front and rear plates and others only require a rear >plate. > The number of states that do not require a front license plate is dwindling. Also, in California, where no front plate was a "graveyard felony" used to stay awake and talk tp someone, it is being enforced more these days. There is a very simple and profitable reason: traffic cameras that snap a picture of those who bust through a red light can't see a rear plate. Buster Evans |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Fuel stabilizer L.B.C., Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Fuel stabilizer L.B.C., Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: License plates, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: License plates, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |