To: | KGB <kgb@frontiernet.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Mercury ad (no LBC) HELP!!! |
Date: | Wed, 25 May 2005 15:19:42 -0400 |
Cc: | Spridgeteers <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cwQB1M0/PmktutIpV/BidmZr2vSd3f6x9MK/EGWvS4c9xAFfUOxAbdsjoJH5XC8jHMP2FWDLU79w16d+d6LM+Ll9b4eX8M9kDmvm4pufp1ok0k48r5O65maPv9DHfAa2vnu/E1hHgXlTHM6t9uDajOO0pngOAgzFZGQeNekt4B4= |
References: | <5.2.1.1.0.20050525122507.0454a1b8@email.mtu.edu> <002701c5615c$bf378720$01fea8c0@domain.invalid> j4PJN49n011502 |
Like I tell the customers, I don't design them! The newest Lincolns and Mercurys are actually Mazdas and Volvos underneath. In defense of newer cars, you can't drive any 1965 car for 100,000 miles without changing sparkplugs. Allen Hefner Norristown PA On 5/25/05, KGB <kgb@frontiernet.net> wrote: > I'm sorry, Allen, but those cars are ugly, with a capital UGH. I wouldn't > want one even if I WERE in the market for a new car. > > For what it's worth, after the Great Neon Headgasket Debacle, I have sworn > that my next new car will be about a 1965 model. At least it will be > something with engine components that I am able to understand, and old > enough to have wing windows. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Can colortune help me???, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Mercury ad (no LBC) HELP!!!, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Mercury ad (no LBC) HELP!!!, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: Mercury ad (no LBC) HELP!!!, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |