To: | "Robert E. Shlafer" <PilotRob@webtv.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: 1098 rebuild |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:01:58 -0700 |
Organization: | Morriservice |
References: | <28638-3B5E23AB-473@storefull-158.iap.bryant.webtv.net> |
Other way around, Cap'n! 10CC is the later one with the 2" main bearings. Everything else being equal, the 10CC engine produced about 4 HP more because of the stiffer crank. Regards, Paul A "Robert E. Shlafer" wrote: > Wasn't the early 1098 the cc and the later > wider width bearing model the cg? > > Cap'n. Bob > '61 :{) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Remember Blue smoke?, Unknown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | blue smoke?, Unknown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 1098 rebuild, Unknown |
Next by Thread: | Re: 1098 rebuild, Unknown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |