In a message dated 06/29/2000 2:34:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
type79@ix.netcom.com writes:
<< Maybe I'm naive, but isn't it the responsibility of the firm that orders
the
manufacture of the item, or decides to offer it for sale, to verify that it
is
correct for its application and in all aspects a suitable replacement for the
original part?
And if a supplier will not do that, why can't they simply state that a part
is a
repro?
Jay Fishbein >>
oops...forgot to say...it's probably just as frustrating for Kelvin to work
for a company that receives so much criticism, I know it is for me.........
RH
|