In a message dated 06/29/2000 2:34:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
type79@ix.netcom.com writes:
<< Maybe I'm naive, but isn't it the responsibility of the firm that orders
the
manufacture of the item, or decides to offer it for sale, to verify that it
is
correct for its application and in all aspects a suitable replacement for the
original part?
And if a supplier will not do that, why can't they simply state that a part
is a
repro?
Jay Fishbein >>
errr Jay, that wouldn't be a repro...maybe a re tar do, or found art re sem
blo...but not a repro...
RH...still at work after 11 hours and getting bitchy....
|