I know that it's not the original motor. as the engine # 10CCDAHxxxxx
preferable to the 10CG though, did the later 1100's have the pcv that I
described?
Andy
>From: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>
>Reply-To: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>
>To: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>
>CC: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: PCV needed?
>Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:20:37 -0400
>
>If your '63 has this type of PCV, it ain't original, or it ain't a '63.
>('63s have a 1098cc engine with mechanical fuel pump and a hose going from
>the valve cover to the front air cleaner only. No other PCV system, as
>that
>didn't start until '64.
>
>Bob
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Webster <trunkie@hotmail.com>
>To: otte@cats.ucsc.edu <otte@cats.ucsc.edu>
>Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Date: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 12:00 PM
>Subject: Re: PCV needed?
>
>
> >I have a 63 mkII sprite with no pollution crud and, what I believe to be,
> >its original pcv system intact. It consists of a stiff hose coming 6
>inches
> >vertically up from the centre of the intake manifold to a 2inch
>circular,
> >flat topped valve with a hose running from the frontside of that to the
>oil
> >separator. It keeps the engine under negative pressure i.e partial
>vaccuum,
> >with an oil cap that seals or almost seals so that if I remove the oil
>cap,
> >the rpm increases.
>
|