shotimes
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Shotimes] Global Warming

To: "Ron Childs" <rbchilds@pacbell.net>,
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Global Warming
From: "bd nesbit" <bdnesbit@sc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 20:38:35 -0400
I do not know which is which in your statement.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ron Childs
  To: bd nesbit ; Bill Strobel ; shotimes
  Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 9:06 PM
  Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Global Warming


  "young earth theory" ??

  Some theories are proven to a scientific standard and some are not.

  -Ron


  bd nesbit <bdnesbit@sc.rr.com> wrote:
    How do you know that this planet has been around for millions of years? I
    do not believe that it has been here that long. I happen to believe in a
    "young earth" theory. Please don't go into the carbon dating or argon gas
    dating and that 'crap'. It just ain't so.
    Thanks,
    David
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Bill Strobel"
    To: "Times List SHO"
    Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 3:10 PM
    Subject: [Shotimes] Global Warming


    > The issue isn't whether the planet is changing or not, the issue should
be
    > what to do about it. First off fossil evidence tells me that at one
time,
    > in Canada, where there is now ice and snow, there use used to be lush
    > vegetation and the area was inhabited by large cold blooded animals.
    > Second geological evidence, tells me Pittsburgh PA was once covered by a
    > glacier hundreds of meters thick. Which earth is the one we should be
    > preserving? The planet changes, it has done so for millions of years
    > without mans interference what makes anyone think that a few hundred
years
    > of mans interference is going to accelerate or slow down what has
occurred
    > naturally in the past. Greenies look out and say the temp is rising, we
    > must be at fault, we must react, when ample evidence shows that at one
    > time Canada was a tropical forest. Could the planet just be trying to go
    > back to that point and we just happen to be living while it is doing it?
    > Outlawing planet change will not work, the
    > earth can't read. Instead of wasting time trying to stop the inevitable
    > and figuring out who or who isn't the blame, time and resources would be
    > better spent trying to figure the impact of the change and what benefits
    > and consequences we need to plan for in the future. The earth will
    > change, man can not stop it. Better to adapt than die. The earth has
    > experienced both ice ages and periods of great warmth. Trying to
preserve
    > a 20-40 year climate period (1930-1970) in a planet that has seen vast
    > extremes in its millions of years of existence is ludicrous.
    >
    > ---------------------------------
    > Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
    > rates starting at 1"/min.
    > _______________________________________________
    > Shotimes mailing list
    > Shotimes@autox.team.net
    > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
    _______________________________________________
    Shotimes mailing list
    Shotimes@autox.team.net
    http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>