ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stock Shock Chalk Talk

To: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>
Subject: Re: Stock Shock Chalk Talk
From: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:06:37 -0700
No Jerry. That portion of the rule is not under review if I understand
correctly. When Jaguars go, I go. You may be interested to tune in on
discussions though, and hear those thinking a 10 year cutoff for stock is a
good idea. And that is why we can't leave the SEB to operate in a vacuum
without input from the majority. Kind of a proletariat uprising.

Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>
To: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Stock Shock Chalk Talk


> It's impossible to get "stock" shocks for my
> Jaguar.  Would I be ruled out, then?  Is the idea
> that "stock" category is for new cars only?
>
> Jerry
>
> Jerry Mouton                              "Laissez les bons temps rouler!"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Tabacco" <atabacco@california.com>
>
>
> > The idea has Meritt and there was a lot of discussion about that but
even
> I
> > can see that replacement with realistic units as being ok.
> > Tony
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carl Merritt" <CMerritt@luminous.com>
> >
> > > You know, this may seem like a crazy idea, but why not just limit
Stock
> > > class to stock shocks?  Hmmm...the simplicity of it is downright
> scary...
> > >
> > > -Carl

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>