autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: rev limiter?

To: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Subject: RE: rev limiter?
From: "Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 11:22:16 -0600
> > tachometer, it might have to be legal -- a shift light is
> simply
> > a form of tachometer, provided the trigger is a simple RPM
> counter.
>
> That was my reading of the rules: since gauges and indicators are
> allowed, I couldn't find a philosophical basis for claiming that
> a shift indicator - whether it's a light or an audible warning -
> is not allowed. Once a general allowance is made, it seems to me
> that you can't selectively go back on that. This looks like a
> candidate for some rewording of the rules, if it is generally
> believed that shift indicators should not be allowed in Stock.

* From the rule book as quoted at
* http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/car_class_stock_rules.html#s131 :
* Accessories, gauges, indicators, lights and other appearance,
* comfort and convenience modifications which have no effect on
* performance and/or handling and do not materially reduce the
* weight of the car are permitted. This does not allow driver's
* seat substitutions. Delayed shutdown devices such as the "Turbo
* Timer", which perform no function while the car is in motion,
* are permitted.

Yes, gauges and indicators are specifically listed as allowed but the rest
of the sentence has limitations on the allowance.

A lot depends on the definition of "have no effect on performance and/or
handling".  Does it mean of the car or the car with a driver.  A case could
be made either way.

The clarifications in the next two sentences could be used to bolster the
case that this does not allow items that assist the driver's control of the
car while on the course.

What is the effect of an item in the car?  If it is for comfort and
convenience without a performance assist, the rule says OK.  If it is to
assist their driving, the rule is unclear.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>