I think the issue folks are concerned about is that if you have a car
quick enough to require an NHRA - legal cage, that cage is illegal in
some solo classes, because NHRA requires it to be welded in. This is a
problem for the folks we're trying to attract to the ST and SM classes,
for instance, who often are drag racers first, then find out about Solo
II.
Someday I'd like to own a car quick enough to need an NHRA cage. . .
;^)
Chuck (I went shopping for a fast car an all I got was this stupid
Fiero) Schultz
---------------------------
Hottvr@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 10/11/00 4:10:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> free2000@quixnet.net writes:
>
> << James Rogerson writes:
>
> > We don't need a definitive Solo2 cage rule that follows any road race or
> drag specifications.
> > Here's why:
> > We don't need mandatory roll over protection. >>
>
> I must be missing something here? What sparked this debate? Is there
> something on the horizon that I didn't catch?
>
> Mike(It doesn't apply to me, but I would still like to know)B. 99cm
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Schultz / Mailto:n2pua4@peoplepc.com
/ New Home page: http://www.n2pua4.webprovider.com/
Eastaboga / (Under construction forever!)
Alabama / AIM Screen Name: n2pua ICQ ID Number: 11654121
36260 / It's not the thing you fling, but the fling, itself!
|