Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vintage\s+eligibility\s+\&\s+intent\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vintage\s+eligibility\s+\&\s+intent\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: "Mark Palmer" <mgvrmark@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 21:55:07 -0000; Mike, David, et al, It all comes down to the line-drawing game, doesn't it? Maybe some types of cars, and some vintages of cars, should require period race history to avoid lopsided fields of modern,; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00119.html (13,700 bytes)
2. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:09:51 EDT; Remember when the Porsche was classified, if briefly, as a sedan? And the AMX, because it had no rear seat, as a sports car? Strange times indeed. Bill; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00121.html (7,909 bytes)
3. RE: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: Mike.Savin@nokia.com; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:17:30 -0500; I understand the arguments, pro and con. I think it is great that people have resurrected old racing specials, that is, one-off race cars and we get to see them race once again. But as someone said,; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00123.html (15,543 bytes)
4. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: "Charles Christ" <cfchrist@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 22:35:28 -0000; secure your father's actual car ! return it back to racing trim and never look back! i know! i have restored my father's last car and sat in it! it is a one off special. but it was my father's car, a; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00124.html (17,980 bytes)
5. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: MHKitchen@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:15:11 EDT; It depends on three things... You, you, and you! If you've got the money and time to do it, my vote would be damn the restoration, bring HISTORY back to LIFE! Go for your dad's car! Unfortunately, n; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00126.html (8,054 bytes)
6. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hammatt" <shammatt@sos.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 22:03:42 -0700; I am the proud custodian of our family Corvair. I took my mom in Oct 1964 to the dealership for her to pick up here first "new" car that she had ever owned. It's been in her garage ever since, I now; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00128.html (9,442 bytes)
7. Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: "Brian Caldersmith" <BrianTC@bigpond.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:53:22 +1000; You guys really are in a mess over there. And it seems it has all been going on too long, with too many clubs, promoters and vested interests throughout the country all looking after themselves for i; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00129.html (9,648 bytes)
8. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: "Roger Sieling" <Rogsie@telesistech.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:56:51 -0400; I just last year inherited the Model T roadster I help my father build back in the late 50s, early 60s with flathead V8-60 power and model A axles with 40 Ford hydraulic brakes, 35 Ford K-H wire whee; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00131.html (10,840 bytes)
9. RE: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: "Oker, William" <OkerWR@navair.navy.mil>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 06:34:52 -0700; Hi Mike, What a perplexing problem! I can only imagine what it would be like to drive "that" Morgan...the very one that my Dad raced and your Dad owned! Bill I understand the arguments, pro and con.; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00134.html (16,227 bytes)
10. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: David Littlefield <dmeadow@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:07:25 -0500; Yes, there are a lot of different groups, but I'm not sure it is a "mess." Americans, and particularly Texans, are an independent bunch. We have a difficult enough time tolerating a centralized Feder; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00138.html (11,475 bytes)
11. Re: Vintage eligibility & intent (score: 1): Author: Walt@chekov.mayfield.hp.com (Walt Boeninger); Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:30:30 PDT; [from vintage-race-owner@autox.team.] I think the 65 GT350 started the "no-back-seat" = sports car concept. That is why in 1966 Shelby couldn't us the GT350 in Trans Am, since it wasn't a sedan......; /html/vintage-race/2001-07/msg00221.html (8,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]