Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Starter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Starter\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:00:34 -0700; Just curious....I believe my 59 TR3 has the original starter. Can someone tell me, in non-mechanic speak, the difference between, and advantage of, a gear reduction starter over stock? thanks, Joe; /html/triumphs/2003-12/msg00515.html (6,425 bytes)
2. RE: starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:54:02 -0800; Not sure I can handle the first part of the question ... the difference is that it has a gear reduction <g> Turns the engine faster, draws less current (meaning it can crank longer for any given bat; /html/triumphs/2003-12/msg00524.html (7,356 bytes)
3. Re: starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:35:43 -0700; Randall summed it up... except to note that you can probably get a nice % of the cost of the gear reduction unit back when you put your old starter on eBay. OTOH -- for some those old starters are ju; /html/triumphs/2003-12/msg00543.html (7,352 bytes)
4. re: starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:36:16 -0500; Many years ago (in the late '70's) the starter in my '59 TR3 quit. I took it to a local starter/generator rebuild shop in town who rebuilt it for an inexpensive, very good price. Because their only; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00590.html (7,153 bytes)
5. Re: starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 22:40:35 -0500; I second this suggestion. The repairman at the shop I use recognized my starter as a Triumph part from 15 feet away as I walked in the door. Ed Purcell; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00603.html (6,737 bytes)
6. RE: starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:00:50 -0800; Absolute agreement. Far and away the best value for these items is local rebuilders. I have had nothing but disappointment buying rebuilts or even new starters/alternators for my TR-6 and my XJ-6 wit; /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00640.html (8,096 bytes)
7. starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 12:54:44 -0800; listers, for a 59 T/R 3-A, serial # 46K, for a bullet-nose starter, the sleeve spring and bendix gear = Moss page # 71 items. 46-47-48, any way I can get them, please let me know what you have availa; /html/triumphs/1999-02/msg00385.html (6,058 bytes)
8. Starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 02 Apr 1998 08:52:22 -0500; Does anyone know if there is a usable replacement for a Vintage Lucas #25541E starter motor. Triumph used these in the 1950's on TR-2's and 3's. Thanks. -MF; /html/triumphs/1998-04/msg00160.html (6,033 bytes)
9. Re: Starter (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 08:59:18 -0400; You might be pleasantly surprised if you try a knowledgeable import car parts place. 3 or 4 years ago, I went in to my local Beck-Arnley reseller and was able to get a rebuilt starter for my Dad's '5; /html/triumphs/1998-04/msg00535.html (6,765 bytes)
10. starter (score: 1): Author: "Jim & Kay" <jscott16@netexpress.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:52:52 -0600; I have a 1959 TR3A, comm. # 60000 and bought a transmission with comm. # 40,000. The starters are different and my question is if I put the old tran. into my car with a short nose starter, is that al; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00207.html (6,605 bytes)
11. RE: starter (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:15:31 -0800; The flywheel is definitely an issue, unless by some chance your car has the earlier flywheel already. The later ring gear (on the flywheel) is slightly smaller in diameter, so the early starter will; /html/triumphs/2005-11/msg00208.html (7,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]