Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SU\'s\s+or\s+Weber\s+on\s+a\s+Spit\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SU\'s\s+or\s+Weber\s+on\s+a\s+Spit\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. SU's or Weber on a Spit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:50:51 -0800 FILETIME=[126C4F50:01C0B344]; What does the list think is the better carb set-up on a 1500 Spit, dual HS2s or a Weber? I have the Weber on right now, but I have a nice set (or two) of the SUs, Is it worth trying or should I just; /html/triumphs/2001-03/msg00919.html (7,036 bytes)
2. Re: SU's or Weber on a Spit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:05:49 -0700; Never "A" Weber! If you are going Weber, get 2 DCOE's A single weber DGV is ok but not a real speed burner because of it's progressive linkage. A single DCOE is inefficient because of the unequal len; /html/triumphs/2001-03/msg00920.html (7,807 bytes)
3. Re: SU's or Weber on a Spit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 19:46:31 -0800 FILETIME=[D95E5110:01C0B34B]; Hmmm....I forgot to mention the Weber I had on the Spit I see. It is a single DGV on the Cannon manifold. I do NOT have the choke hooked up...lol Darrell, in the High Desert of California 62 TR-4 CT; /html/triumphs/2001-03/msg00923.html (7,738 bytes)
4. Re: SU's or Weber on a Spit? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:50:11 EST; << I do not have a problem keeping the SUs on my TR-4s in shape, so I do not care about the extra effort that the SUs would take. >> Darrell, I have an early '70 Spit Mk3 1296cc engine with twin SU's; /html/triumphs/2001-03/msg00941.html (7,363 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]