- 1. Commission Vs Body Number (Herald) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 13:22:20 +0100
- Some listers will remember that I recently bought a 1959 Herald Saloon as (yet) another project. The commission number is G6751, and the body number attached to the car is GM3XXX (that is three thou
- /html/triumphs/1999-07/msg00007.html (8,279 bytes)
- 2. Re: Commission Vs Body Number (Herald) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 06:14:04 -0700
- It must be one of those "extremely Rare" Heralds with a General Motors body 8^) Joe -- "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort." -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
- /html/triumphs/1999-07/msg00013.html (9,264 bytes)
- 3. Re: Commission Vs Body Number (Herald) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:45:38 -0400 ()
- Well, I'll happily add to the confusion! :-) I have noticed that many early Herald 948 convertibles have an "RC" body prefix. However, my own 948 Convertible carries body number RT92. (Yes, RT instea
- /html/triumphs/1999-07/msg00022.html (9,086 bytes)
- 4. Re: Commission Vs Body Number (Herald) (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 16:21:06 +0100
- I guessed the same as you regarding the new assembly hall, but I don't think that's the case. One of the Heralds I have on record (sadly dismantled now, but it was VERY rough) was registered on Janu
- /html/triumphs/1999-07/msg00026.html (8,835 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu