- 1. [TR] Tire Speed (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Mathews <mathews@uga.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:43:13 -0500
- Education can be a dangerous thing. Next quarter at the VoTech school, I'm taking suspensions and front ends. Reading ahead I came across a paragraph that discussed tire speed dynamics> It said that
- /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00906.html (7,297 bytes)
- 2. RE: [TR] Tire Speed (score: 1)
- Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:05:34 -0800
- Like Einstein said, it's all about frame of reference. That paragraph is talking about the speed of the surface of the tire relative to the road. If you look at it from the road's point of view, hop
- /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00909.html (8,286 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TR] Tire Speed (score: 1)
- Author: TR6UO@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:14:29 EST
- I've never considered tire speed relative to road speed, but I think I see what is meant by the equation. It possibly refers to the road speed added to the tire rotation speed. Consider a tire on th
- /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00910.html (7,209 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TR] Tire Speed (score: 1)
- Author: "pethier@isd.net" <pethier@isd.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:24:29 -0600
- No. 78 MPH is my guess. Up at a 45-degree angle at the back and down at a 45-degree angle the front. Now, if the statement of the question is "ignoring vertical motion, what is the instantaneous vel
- /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00924.html (8,830 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TR] Tire Speed (score: 1)
- Author: Cameron Rooke <beaker211@rogers.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:11:19 -0500 (EST)
- Hate to be picky, especially when the information doesn't really matter anyway, but the tire at the top would be going faster than 110mph relative to the ground if you consider compression of the tir
- /html/triumphs/2006-03/msg00925.html (7,737 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu