Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+K\s+\&\s+N\s+air\s+filters\s*$/: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 06:10:03 -0500
This "k&n won't filter anything" is a myth, unsupported by any objective scientific study. Oil bath filters are great if they are serviced and you can put up with the mess. Since most of us aren't dr
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00652.html (13,531 bytes)

42. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 05:10:25 -0700
On 5/19/12 4:10 AM, spook01@comcast.net wrote: This "k&n won't filter anything" is a myth, unsupported by any objective scientific study. I have a friend who shipped his Land Rover to South Africa fo
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00653.html (18,276 bytes)

43. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: John Macartney <flywheelcoventry1@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:23:48 +0100 (BST)
IMHO, the KN filter is a waste of money. I had two on my Triumph 2000, noticed nothing in terms of 'increased performance' (but then I don't believe such claims anyway) and certainly no increase in t
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00654.html (13,915 bytes)

44. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: Robert Jones <rjones@wfeca.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:35:41 -0500
John an All; Every English car magazine and many Englishmen pretty well treats everything automotive originating in the USA with disdain. Could there be a little of that creeping in here? noticed and
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00655.html (13,954 bytes)

45. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: John Macartney <flywheelcoventry1@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:08:55 +0100 (BST)
Hi, Bob I had absolutely no idea until getting your post that KN was of American origin/manufacture :) so *very, v-e-r-y* sorry to one and all if I inadvertantly trod on patriotic toes. I still think
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00656.html (16,470 bytes)

46. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:24:00 -0700
On the contrary, every objective study I've seen shows that the K&N filters are at the back of the pack as far as both removing and holding dirt. This one is a bit less "scientific" but quite valid,
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00657.html (13,602 bytes)

47. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: Mark Hooper <mhooper@indiefilmnet.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:17:00 -0400
In the past I have installed K&N filters on my motorcycles and my TR6 for the following highly technical reasons: /start technical reasons 1 - They look pretty. 2 - They let me fit nice shiny filter
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00661.html (14,763 bytes)

48. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:26:38 -0500
If so, I advise you to file a false advertising claim with the Feds. That would be the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection. False Advertising. Won't cost you a dime to file. Those of you in California
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00662.html (13,768 bytes)

49. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:49:14 -0700
Examine their ad copy carefully. Nowhere do they claim that their filter will remove even as much dirt as other filters. It is a "better filter" because it flows more air. It removes "99% of dirt",
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00663.html (12,520 bytes)

50. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 11:52:36 -0700
So, where is YOUR independent scientific study, showing that it is possible to flow more air and stop more dirt at the same time, using the magic oil and one of the oldest filter technologies known
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00664.html (11,948 bytes)

51. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:26:11 -0600
/start technical reasons 1 - They look pretty. 2 - They let me fit nice shiny filter enclosures /end technical reasons They certainly do flow more easily than paper filters. I've only had limited exp
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00665.html (15,264 bytes)

52. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:02:54 -0500
Ah, but think of the hit a much larger company would take.. I think you should turn them in and let attorneys parse their ware touting. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone Examine their ad copy caref
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00666.html (12,771 bytes)

53. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:43:48 -0700
What much larger company? No, no, it was your idea first. You go right ahead and waste your time, I'd rather enjoy my Triumph. -- Randall ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Donate: http://www.team.net/do
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00667.html (11,722 bytes)

54. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:55:58 -0500
I am not claiming they are lying about their filtration claims. You should report them if you truly think they are engaging in false advertising. We all know you can hook a filter up sufficiently fin
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00668.html (14,329 bytes)

55. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:57:46 -0500
I think they build a fine filter. It's only logical you take up the nay sayers banner. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone What much larger company? No, no, it was your idea first. You go right ahead
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00669.html (12,104 bytes)

56. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:25:00 -0700
No, I did NOT say that. What I said was that I believe, on the information I have, that they let more dirt through than the average paper element filter. I am still waiting for you to present ANY ev
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00670.html (13,303 bytes)

57. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:09:14 -0500
Below. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone No, I did NOT say that. What I said was that I believe, on the information I have, that they let more dirt through than the average paper element filter. +y
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00671.html (14,173 bytes)

58. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:19:33 -0500
And the HP 1 oil filter is rated at 20 microns. Go figure. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone No, I did NOT say that. What I said was that I believe, on the information I have, that they let more di
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00672.html (13,289 bytes)

59. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:45:51 -0700
Ok, it's obvious you haven't been paying attention. I said their advertising was not false, you're the one that said it was. They simply don't claim that their filter removes more dirt (or even as m
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00674.html (12,884 bytes)

60. Re: [TR] K & N air filters (score: 1)
Author: "spook01@comcast.net" <spook01@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:44:40 -0500
I own k&n. I usually peruse the internet in order to mess with unbelievers.. My lawyers will be in contact with all of you. Lol rof. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone Ok, it's obvious you haven't b
/html/triumphs/2012-05/msg00677.html (13,028 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu