Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+4\s+vs\s+6\s+vane\s+water\s+pump\s+impellor\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+4\s+vs\s+6\s+vane\s+water\s+pump\s+impellor\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75TR6@TR6.Danielsonfamily.org>; Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 21:04:25 -0400 6tdpPq/Fma17z8E4gMwgTYegYzG2g3gQso4AgdSAWi9FE1gUJf 1MdrBk6BCye3Jm0czTxxnGchfdtQrcQ/FZhVPVywNX7WTLQghV mPxZ5KmMiXfHccvvmSJVvweVImN38U/o4AMlrbmEZdgWMBOeS/ 1o509qASHH4Zdn; I recently had a TR6 spare water pump rebuilt by The Flying Dutchman and one of his options is a 6 vane impellor. I installed the pump last week and had the upper coolant hose (thermostat to manifold; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00004.html (9,959 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 03:16:49 -0700; Water pump design is an extremely complicated topic, even for a pump running at constant rpm, let alone with the widely varying rpm, head and flow parameters that are inherent in automotive cooling; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00005.html (10,292 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: Darrell Walker <darrellw360@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 06:19:03 -0700; radiator can't cool it properly so the car runs hotter. I m only a software engineer, but I ve always been skeptical of this argument. Sure, perhaps per unit volume less heat will be removed as the c; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00006.html (10,420 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "John Macartney" <john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 23:37:24 +0100; "Even then, it is going to be hard to say which is "better", since I've never seen any evidence that lack of water flow is a problem with our engines." Far be it from me to challenge our technical gu; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00008.html (12,266 bytes)
5. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "John Macartney" <john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:12:12 +0100; Oh Fountainhead of such unquestionable knowledge, may I most respectfully suggest you do a quick spool-back and exclude the Stag V8? :) It was a mountain of trouble on the cooling side of things and; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00009.html (10,007 bytes)
6. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "dave n" <dave@ranteer.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:26:31 -0500; thank you for that, John. for those interested in the stag, wikipedia has an interesting article that discusses some of the engineering goals and missteps. I found it rather interesting. http://en.wi; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00010.html (12,559 bytes)
7. [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: Pete Arakelian <arakelianp@mossmotors.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 07:39:29 -0700; high pressure and high volume. As I remember the high pressure had more vanes, the high volume had longer vanes. And, I believe, Melling, the choice for VW oil pumps, no longer supplies the high pre; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00011.html (9,153 bytes)
8. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: Philip Ethier <pethier7@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:33:06 -0500; Joe showed it to me. I should have photogrphed it. And I appreciate that! I've never had a hint of overheating. I had uncle jack out for a run on Wednesday to a club meeting and a small car show in; /html/triumphs/2014-05/msg00012.html (11,467 bytes)
9. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:30:02 -0700; You are quite right, John, I was thinking only of the TR2-6, not the Stag nor other Triumphs that I have no experience with (Spitfire, Herald, etc.). I should have been more explicit. I agree entire; /html/triumphs/2014-06/msg00001.html (10,070 bytes)
10. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: Anthony Rhodes <spamiam@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 18:07:55 +0100; Bob, I agree with the reply saying more flow should result on BETTER cooling, all else being equal. But not everything else is necessarily equal. I think the biggest issue is laminar vs turbulent flo; /html/triumphs/2014-06/msg00002.html (10,912 bytes)
11. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <TR3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 11:01:35 -0700; I'm not sure why this showed up again today; but I'd like to clarify what I said before. I think there is no doubt that the Stag cooling system was marginal at best (and criminally negligent at wors; /html/triumphs/2014-06/msg00004.html (9,463 bytes)
12. Re: [TR] 4 vs 6 vane water pump impellor (score: 1): Author: Chris Simo <ccsimonsen@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:25:33 -0400; I googled the bete noire reference and found a nice cake recipe. My wife loved it. ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Archive: http://www.team.net/archive; /html/triumphs/2014-06/msg00020.html (8,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]