Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Panhard\s+bar\s+vs\s+Axle\s+Stabilizer\s+bar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Panhard\s+bar\s+vs\s+Axle\s+Stabilizer\s+bar\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Panhard bar vs Axle Stabilizer bar (score: 1): Author: Ric Otte <otte@cats.ucsc.edu>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 07:48:26 -0800; I have a quarter eliptic car and was thinking about getting a Panhard bar. I called Mini Mania and they recommended their own Axle Stabilizer bar instead of a Panhard bar. They said it did all that a; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00775.html (7,449 bytes)
2. Re: Panhard bar vs Axle Stabilizer bar (score: 1): Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:17:35 -0800 (PST); that's the one I have. It works great as a Panhard bar, is a clean installation, invisible, only 4 holes to be drilled in the bottom of the trans tunnel, not the trunk, but an anti-tramp bar (tracti; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00785.html (8,807 bytes)
3. Re: Panhard bar vs Axle Stabilizer bar (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 16:08:10 EST; << the advantages and disadvantages of each? >> The Panhard bar will do more and is neater - a hall mark of good engineering. Daniel1312; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00797.html (7,125 bytes)
4. Re: Panhard bar vs Axle Stabilizer bar (score: 1): Author: Matthew P Johnson <spriteguy@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:47:10 -0500; I looked carefully at different bar configurations before I built my own. After analyzing every different attachment point I could come up with a decided on something very similar to the Winner's Cir; /html/spridgets/1999-02/msg00815.html (8,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]