Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+and\s+non\-verbal\s+communications\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Conn <conn@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 08:02:30 -0600
I might be a For Laura: From a disinterested party, I must say that from a casual glance, the bulk of your posts seem almost arrogant. From reading your comments, I have come to the conclusion that y
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00569.html (10,035 bytes)

2. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 08:11:56 -0600
(Brad gets up on soapbox) To Conn@wctc.net, who seems to be afraid to use his name in a post, I read the first part where you chewed out Laura about her arrogance and then the other part of your post
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00571.html (11,833 bytes)

3. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Conn <conn@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 08:22:25 -0600
Perhaps you did not read carefully enough? I did not, "chew out" Laura, I simply illustrated that what people read is often not what the writer intended. She had commented that someone else was being
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00573.html (8,757 bytes)

4. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 08:32:52 -0600
Maybe you had better reread your OWN post then because the first half of the comment to Laura you say "seem almost arrogant" which is somewhat forgiving, whereas the 2nd half of your post to Laura s
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00574.html (9,700 bytes)

5. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Conn <conn@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 08:45:38 -0600
I said that from reading her posts I had come to that conclusion. Based solely on the content of the posts in question, this was one reader's interpretation. Again, a simple illustration of how a rea
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00575.html (8,905 bytes)

6. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Tom Strange <jantoms@vbe.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 09:27:13 -0800
OKAY EVERYONE, 8>) Lets all go take an ant-acid, have a cup of coffee, & try ot meet each other one day in person. I have met several of the listers, & talked to even more on the phone, & havent foun
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00579.html (10,207 bytes)

7. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 09:26:22 -0600
Of course Laura is bragging about her car! I kind of thought that part of the function of this list was for us to be able to brag about our cars and tell everyone else what we went through to get th
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00580.html (10,820 bytes)

8. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Conn <conn@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 09:35:19 -0600
So, I take this to mean that my thoughts are not welcome here? So be it.
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00581.html (8,696 bytes)

9. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: "Laura G." <savercool@email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 10:34:19 -0800
Yes ConnI am bragging about my car-like every other person. What I was objecting to was Dan's rather unpleasent tone to N.A.-I didn't say much when he was putting me down-but then I saw it happening
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00590.html (10,166 bytes)

10. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Conn <conn@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 13:52:23 -0600
You certainly have a right to be proud of your car. And my only point, despite what anyone read into it, was that perhaps we should all consider our words more carefully. I bet that Dan didn't think
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00594.html (9,912 bytes)

11. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: "Laura G." <savercool@email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 12:16:09 -0800
Wow! What a guy, to name his spit after the girl who totalled the first one! (I'm not the same Laura-I assure you! I'd rather be dead than to kill a spit!<g>) Laura G. and Nigel --Original Message--
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00596.html (10,753 bytes)

12. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Conn <conn@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:50:58 -0600
I felt I owed it to her... kind of a memorial, if you get my drift.
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00601.html (8,011 bytes)

13. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: Bob Sykes <s1500@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:28:56 -0800
Hi Laura, I think all of us on this list are proud of our cars, modified or not. Statements like; "twice the horsepower of a stock 1500" and "My 1500 has been clocked at over 100mph and the red line
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00603.html (8,352 bytes)

14. Re: Spitfires and non-verbal communications (score: 1)
Author: "Laura G." <savercool@email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 13:44:01 -0800
I get your drift-lol Laura G. and Nigel --Original Message-- From: Conn <conn@wctc.net> To: Laura G. <savercool@email.msn.com> Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net <spitfires@autox.team.net> Date: Friday, No
/html/spitfires/1998-11/msg00604.html (8,296 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu