Conn,
Maybe you had better reread your OWN post then because the first half of
the comment to Laura you say "seem almost arrogant" which is somewhat
forgiving, whereas the 2nd half of your post to Laura says "I have come to
the conclusion" which in my book any way you cut it thats stating an
opinion. A not particularly nice opinion either.
>
>
> Brad Kahler wrote:
>
> > (Brad gets up on soapbox)
> >
> > To Conn@wctc.net, who seems to be afraid to use his name in a post, I
> > read the first part where you chewed out Laura about her arrogance and
> > then the other part of your post where you were telling people to try
> > and look at the positive side of an email post. Maybe you aught to take
> > your own advice when it comes to reading Laura's posts and maybe lump
> > her into the rest of the spit owner category.
>
> Perhaps you did not read carefully enough? I did not, "chew out" Laura, I
> simply illustrated that what people read is often not what the writer
> intended. She had commented that someone else was being somewhat
> inappropriate, and my intention was to show that her (or anyone's) posts
> could be misconstrued. I did not say her posts were *intended* to be
> arrogant, I said they appeared to be arrogant. That's a *big* difference.
>
> Sorry you were offended.
>
Brad (Lincoln Nebraska 402-464-1502)
My Web Site Http://www.141.com/triumphs
1964 Spitfire4 BFC25720L -- 1973 Spitfire Mk4
1962 TR4 CT288L -- 1959 TR3A TS41311L
1951 Dodge Truck B-3-B-108
|