Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Driveshafted\,\s+Part\s+2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Driveshafted\,\s+Part\s+2\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "R.D. Waid" <msp01091@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 22:00:20 -0500; I found the two missing rollers from the sliding spline driveshaft!! The questions I have now are: 1. Do all the rollers lie in the same plane in the races? As the driveshaft was falling apart in my; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00100.html (8,821 bytes)
2. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 20:51:21 -0700; Yes, They all lie in the same plane. The flat ends are in a row with the rounded bodies touching each other in a row, so that when the thing flexes in and out, they roll. YOu are very fortunate to ha; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00102.html (8,586 bytes)
3. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "RALPH JANNELLI" <RALPH.JANNELLI@Prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 09:36:39 -0400; Joe et al. I have seen references to the little cylinders both ways, in-line and alternating. I have tried them both ways, both work. It seemed to me that there was a little less slop in the sliding; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00108.html (9,559 bytes)
4. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:39:56 -0400; The rollers should be alternating; the yokes should be parallel to each other. Standard driveline practice. (There was only one occasion where I had to set the u-joints out of phase, and that was for; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00158.html (10,469 bytes)
5. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 20:02:44 -0700; Let me see if I am reading this right. Are you saying that every other roller should be pointing in an opposite direction from its adjacent ones, or that the rows of rollers should be pointing in op; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00163.html (11,699 bytes)
6. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:07:28 -0400; The shaft I disassembled and the picture in Haynes had (in each row) alternating horizontal/vertical rollers. i.e. each row of ten rollers had five vertical and five horizontal. As I said, Bentley's; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00173.html (10,507 bytes)
7. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:11:30 -0400; Sorry, I lied about the source of my information -- it was an Autopress Ltd publication by Philip H Smith _Triumph_Spitfire,_ Vitesse,_1962-68_Autobook_, First edition 1969, reprinted 1971, ISBN 0 8; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00174.html (8,799 bytes)
8. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:37:59 -0400; For a more authoratitive answer about the sliding joint, the best I can offer right now is the cross-section of the frictionless propeller shaft on page 2.402 of the Bentley reprint of the Herald, V; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00175.html (8,301 bytes)
9. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 07:29:08 -0700; That is what I thought you said originally. THe trouble is, I can't se how that could possible work. These things are roller bearings and having them oppose the adjoining one seems to defeat their pu; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00183.html (11,710 bytes)
10. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Carter Shore <clshore@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 07:59:55 -0700 (PDT); Joe, et al, The key is that height of the rollers is just slightly less than diameter. The torque is transmitted from the outer groove face to the inner (or vice versa, depends on accel or deccel) by; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00186.html (8,548 bytes)
11. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "R.D. Waid" <msp01091@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:40:59 -0500; Thank you for the information. What does the retainer look like? Is it a metal or rubber washer of some type? Bob Waid FK4081L --; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00197.html (11,467 bytes)
12. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:49:34 -0400; Bentley is completely silent on the subject -- except to say "no user serviceable parts inside" (the actual words are "NOTE: The sliding joint should not be dismantled for any reason." p. 2-404, las; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00214.html (10,485 bytes)
13. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:40:11 -0400; Within the threaded cup that screws onto the sliding extension there should be a thin flat washer with an ID that fits over the splined piece (allows it to be installed), then a felt washer (soaked i; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00217.html (10,329 bytes)
14. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:46:32 -0400; Thanks for the information. I didn't even think to check roller dimensions while I had them out and clean. My bigger concern was the sloppy feel in the joint. Time will tell if it is worn beyond usa; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00219.html (8,651 bytes)
15. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougnad@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 10:51:09 -0400; I've been following this thread, but I'm confused. Have we been talking about the "soup can" style of joint that was used on 1500's? I have a spare splined shaft, but it is very conventional and simp; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00268.html (8,402 bytes)
16. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 07:57:46 -0700; There apparently were two sliding shafts used on the Spitfire/GT6 series. I have recently taken a hard look at both types and can say for sure that the earlier ones have splines while the later type; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00270.html (8,837 bytes)
17. Re: Driveshafted, Part 2 (score: 1): Author: "Donald H. Locker" <dhl@chelseamsl.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:42:24 -0400; We're talking about a different version of the propshaft. The end view of the splined portions looks like a cross and ten little rollers fit into each groove. The mating female part has internal groo; /html/spitfires/2000-06/msg00275.html (8,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]