- 1. 1,296 (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Vaughan" <lvaughan@pldi.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:33:52 -0600
- Will the 1500 head and flywheel fit the 1296 Mark III small journal motor? Larry
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00120.html (6,829 bytes)
- 2. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@COX.NET>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:12:22 -0700
- The short answer for the head is "Yes". But if you put one on without doing some shaving, you will end up with a very low compression engine. The thing to do is Calculate the compression ratio you wa
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00122.html (7,809 bytes)
- 3. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: Douglas Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:09:46 -0500
- I believe somebody (Rimmer Bros?) sells an adapter kit that has some little that reduce the diameter of the bolt holes in the 1500 flywheel, so it can be bolted to the 1300 crank. Doug Braun '72 Spit
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00123.html (7,429 bytes)
- 4. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: Kevin Rhodes <krhodes1@maine.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:23:04 -0500
- For the flywheel, an early 1500 flywheel does have the small bolts. Has to be from a 73 or a 74 1500. This is the flywheel you want to connect a 1296 to a late transmission. When I had my 1296 rebuil
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00124.html (8,139 bytes)
- 5. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Gingerich" <wrgingerich@msn.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:37:49 -0600
- When I rebuilt the '73 engine (after dropping thrust washers in the '74) I found that the flywheels were differant. The '73 had the small bolts, the '74 had the large bolts. I'm not sure if this adds
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00125.html (8,677 bytes)
- 6. Re: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: EDENMA@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:48:49 EST
- Both BillG and Kevin are correct! My wife's 73 has the smaller holes in the flywheel but so did my 74 when I took the 1500 out to install the GT6 engine. However, another 74 parts car I had a few yea
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00136.html (7,277 bytes)
- 7. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Gingerich" <wrgingerich@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:17:51 -0600
- OK, I'll muddy the waters a bit more. My '74 (1FM13696IU) has a 3 rail box, and the bigger holes in the flywheel. Yes, I'm confused - sort off. BillG Both BillG and Kevin are correct! My wife's 73 ha
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00137.html (7,839 bytes)
- 8. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill Gingerich" <wrgingerich@msn.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:31:06 -0600
- As I said, my 1FM '74 has the larger holes also. BillG <SNIP> ... the flywheel I took off the 1FM '74 Spit had the larger holes.... <UNSNIP> --Original Message-- From: spitfires-owner@autox.team.net
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00138.html (8,305 bytes)
- 9. RE: 1296 (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@COX.NET>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:49:22 -0700
- Oh, Yes, I guess that is what you said. By this time the waters are so muddy, that I'm having difficultyt seeing! :) Joe As I said, my 1FM '74 has the larger holes also. BillG <SNIP> ... the flywheel
- /html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00139.html (8,735 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu