Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+N\/A\s+Dyno\s+318hp\s+279tq\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shotimes\]\s+N\/A\s+Dyno\s+318hp\s+279tq\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Ryan Pasch" <ryanpasch@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:55:38 -0500; Here is a link to the guys post on shoforum. *http://tinyurl.com/g3acz* ** Before you call bs take a look at his mods. *Modifications*: *Block:* The block is a 3.0\183 C/I bored/ destroked to 182.3 C; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00012.html (7,993 bytes)
2. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:43:35 -0400; And I still do after :) _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00013.html (6,281 bytes)
3. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <bob@hotpursuit.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:56:12 -0700; And putting 70 psi in the tires is something people do when they want to inflate their dyno numbers before selling the car. _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shot; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00014.html (8,429 bytes)
4. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:57:20 -0400; Yep most definitely BS. Hrinsin's 3.4 has a similar setup, and he is only 245-250 WHP. On a Dynojet, IIRC. 318 to the crank would possibly be believable. Mark, your responses to the Forum thread were; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00015.html (8,939 bytes)
5. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:02:32 -0500; How does that increase your HP? Paul L Fisher Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com Amsoil dealer: http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil And putting 70 psi in the tires is something people do when t; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00016.html (9,450 bytes)
6. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:07:52 -0400; It's called "playing to the dyno". I doubt it inflates it much, though. Different tires and pressures can alter the #s, but much of it is a "real" increase or loss. I've heard that very high pressure; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00017.html (10,255 bytes)
7. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:15:09 -0400; It's the torque (280 ft/lbs to the tires) that's the pipe dream. Since torque (sheer rotating power of the crank) comes pretty much (in an atmospheric breathing engine) soley from VE (and mostly fro; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00018.html (9,394 bytes)
8. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:29:09 -0400; Here's the old bit I wrote many years ago from the SHOtimes FAQ about HP numbers games: http://www.shotimes.com/php-bin/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&si d=21&mode=thread&order=0&thol; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00019.html (10,453 bytes)
9. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <bob@hotpursuit.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:44:17 -0700; Because it reduces driveline losses through the tires. Unless this is a salt car, 70 psi is twice normal inflation which will cause less rolling resistance via a smaller contact patch and less power; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00020.html (11,374 bytes)
10. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:57:16 -0500; OK. But what are we talking, 10%, 20%? Paul L Fisher Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com Amsoil dealer: http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil Because it reduces driveline losses through the tires.; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00021.html (10,794 bytes)
11. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Bob" <bob@hotpursuit.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:13:17 -0700; I don't know. A wag: Probably less than 5%. Maybe Dinan would have an opinion: http://www.dinancars.com/whitepapersFile.asp?ID=9 I don't have an issue with the guy, just don't try to compare these nu; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00022.html (11,576 bytes)
12. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "D. Mallinson" <dmall@mwonline.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:18:10 -0500; I doubt if the difference between 35 psi and 70 would make 5% difference, but that is just a guess based on when I had my Dynojet. I could see 1-2 hp difference at most, in a 10psi bump, but we never; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00023.html (11,588 bytes)
13. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: Alan M Yutzy <hoboprodigy@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:28:56 -0400; I was thinking the same thing... I wouldn't want to be in the bay while it was sampling :| -Alan '99 TG _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net h; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00024.html (12,411 bytes)
14. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:32:47 -0500; Yeah, Carter Fuji on the V8 SHO list ran his up to 175 MPH and his tires delaminate. That is just dumb! Paul L Fisher Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com Amsoil dealer: http://www.paul-fishe; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00025.html (12,595 bytes)
15. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:55:58 -0500; Notice that they use the Dynapack dynamometer. This removes all tire slippage from the equation since the wheels are taken off and the dyno is bolted directly to the hub. Paul L Fisher Visit my websi; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00026.html (12,505 bytes)
16. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:21:52 -0400; Good write up. It's amazing how many "car folk" don't understand it (hp/torque/rpm) though. _______________________________________________ Shotimes mailing list Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.t; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00028.html (8,351 bytes)
17. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: Mark Nunnally <marknunnally@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:22:16 -0400; Yeah I was thinking the same. (although I haven't been around as many mustang units compared to dynojets). The 2-3 mustang units I've been around for dyno tests all bolted directly to the hubs (no t; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00029.html (8,451 bytes)
18. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Kerby Haltom" <g.kerby@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:43:25 -0500; Actually, the stated max pressure on my Bridgestone RE-750s is 51 psi max. I think that is fairly unusual for passenger car tires, though... Kerby I doubt if the difference between 35 psi and 70 woul; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00030.html (11,597 bytes)
19. RE: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: "Paul L Fisher" <sho@paul-fisher.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:55:30 -0500; My Kuhmo 712's are 44 psi. Paul L Fisher Visit my website: http://www.paul-fisher.com Amsoil dealer: http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil Actually, the stated max pressure on my Bridgestone RE-750s is 51 p; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00031.html (9,839 bytes)
20. Re: [Shotimes] N/A Dyno 318hp 279tq (score: 1): Author: Ian Fisher <dataflash@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 03:59:18 -0700 (PDT); Yup. Back when LSHOC had a dyno day at AWE (Mustang dyno), I was led to believe that Mustang #'s were actually lower than Dynojet #'s but tend to be more consistent. FWIW, this was a roller drum setu; /html/shotimes/2006-09/msg00060.html (9,101 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]