Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*my\s+apologies\s+to\s+Max\,\s+more\s+discussion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*my\s+apologies\s+to\s+Max\,\s+more\s+discussion\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: William Killeffer <wkilleffer@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:26:53 -0400; I'm sorry for the harsh language used in my reply to your posting the other day. There were more effective and less rude ways to get my message across. Instead of taking the high road, I took the lo; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00083.html (9,383 bytes)
2. Re: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: Brad Wilson <trijagparts@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:51:37 -0500; Hopefully, we will know something on June 10th when PWC are scheduled to hold a "meeting on the companies affairs". Whether that will involve naming the successful bidder(s) remains to be seen. Surpr; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00089.html (10,978 bytes)
3. Re: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:06:43 -0700; No problem. I didn't expect to make a convert. I just didn't think I deserved getting jumped on when I was just espousing the mainstream view. Yes, I suppose it is not entirely out of the question, a; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00090.html (8,284 bytes)
4. Re: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: William Killeffer <wkilleffer@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:09:00 -0400; That could be a problem for the nameplate, at least in the US. BMW won't want anything like that here that could compete with the sales of the Z4. I don't see those cars on the same playing field fro; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00091.html (11,494 bytes)
5. Re: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: William Killeffer <wkilleffer@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:48:15 -0400; It's easier to think that way, to let your wishes get in the way of reason. You're also right about the profits and BMW control. I usually don't have the emotional issue unless cars are involved. I'm; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00092.html (9,199 bytes)
6. RE: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:46:27 +0100; Just to clear up some confusion about who owns which brands: The Rover brand is owned by BMW, but was on indefinite free loan to MG Rover. SAIC (the Chinese company MG Rover were trying to do a deal; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00093.html (8,338 bytes)
7. RE: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard B" <Richard.Gosling@atkinsglobal.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:49:56 +0100; Murray said: "...As the MG-Rover names were on free loan from BMW they are not property which can be sold by the Receivers to anyone as ownership reverts to BMW...." I think you are missing the point; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00099.html (8,614 bytes)
8. Re: my apologies to Max, more discussion (score: 1): Author: Eric Erickson <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:18:21 +0930; Some of you are going to hate what just arrived in my mail today from a firm called "Bonham & Goodman Auctioneers" here in Australia... MG ROVER Administrator's Auction - 12 Page Catalogue 138 cars t; /html/mgs/2005-06/msg00100.html (8,467 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]