Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Coil\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*New\s+Coil\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: New Coil (score: 1): Author: neil.cairns@virgin.net; Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 09:00:52 -0700; I bow to your greater knowledge, but thats how I understood them!! Neil; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00607.html (10,218 bytes)
22. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 11:24:01 EDT; Fellow listers, I'm sorry it has degenerated into this. If I said anything in any of my previous posts that in any way could be construed as a put down of Barney, or anyone else for that matter, it w; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00908.html (18,156 bytes)
23. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: Rich Mason <rmason@ro.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 10:52:40 -0500; Here's a riddle for Dan and Barney When's a coil not a coil? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . when it's a dead horse... :) Actually guys, I have enjoyed your discussion -; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00916.html (8,707 bytes)
24. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 12:59:47 -0500; Hay Dan, Why are you miffed? I thought Barney was fairly circumspect in telling you yer wrong in some cases. Now you are being intentionally sarcastic. Hardly a way to continue a serious discussion.; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00929.html (9,257 bytes)
25. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 13:03:31 -0500; Hay Rich, we're all working onnit! Wish we could keep the personalities out of it. BTW, isn't fluid dynamic much like electron flow, only a bit slower? CR; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00930.html (7,952 bytes)
26. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: "Harlan Jillson" <hjillson@argohouston.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 98 12:30:30 CST; As long as you and Dan and Barney are going to beat this thing to death until everyone understands it, don't forget that the coil "primary" and "secondary" are both part of the same windings, being; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00932.html (8,108 bytes)
27. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 15:07:07; electrons that flow through the light bulb controlled by that switch? Contrary to what you may believe, electricity is not a "flow" of electrons through a wire in the same manner as a flow of water t; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00941.html (10,020 bytes)
28. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: AEKell@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 16:19:39 EDT; << Fellow listers, I'm sorry it has degenerated into this >> I don't think it has degenerated, I'm having a good time trying to keep up. Keep it coming Alan; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00944.html (7,938 bytes)
29. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: Rich Mason <rmason@ro.com> (by way of Gregg Baker <gbaker@customcpu.com>); Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 13:29:21 -0800; Barney and Dan I'd like to second the request for an agreement between those who understand this stuff. I have read and enjoyed all of the bantering and believe I've actually learned a thing or two..; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00952.html (8,585 bytes)
30. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: ccrobins <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 19:28:16 -0500; Argh!....OK.... Oboy, I suppose I'll be forced to go crack a textbook, now. I really shoulda kept my nose out of it after my first post. I wouldn't have become involved except I thought I saw some m; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00970.html (8,159 bytes)
31. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 22:20:13 EDT; Barney, I don't know. I really don't know. As you said, this is the question that has been bugging me from the start. If you can bear with me for one more go-'round, let me describe the circuit, and; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg00975.html (9,958 bytes)
32. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: Robert Alan Reisse <rareisse@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:30:38 -0400; I have been reading the various versions of the debate about ignition circuits and I recalled that I had the manual for a Heathkit Ignition Analyzer. I thought I would post what it says about the ign; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01023.html (8,791 bytes)
33. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 17:51:44; thought I would post what it says about the ignition circuit. (which contains many more turns of wire). The net effect is to "step up" the primary voltage to a level sufficient to fire the spark plug; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01032.html (7,865 bytes)
34. Re: new coil (score: 1): Author: BobMGT@aol.com; Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 00:43:18 EDT; It sounds like the capacitor is protecting the points against excessive arcing. If you didn't suppress this arc it would rob energy needed by the secondary for the spark you really want. Has anyone e; /html/mgs/1998-08/msg01048.html (8,866 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]