Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Manufacturer\'s\s+Profits\s+at\s+Buyer\'s\s+Expense\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Manufacturer\'s\s+Profits\s+at\s+Buyer\'s\s+Expense\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:19:36 -0800; Well, it may have been temporary insanity, but it certainly wasn't marketing... the company had been out of business for eight years. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA,; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00179.html (9,589 bytes)
22. RE: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: "Gordie's Garage" <mg_garage@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:59:51 -0500; Off topic, but I've got to chime in...Paul, do you think it is possible to have used the truck up? Or most of it anyway? Seems that few account for the value they get from the vehicle (car or truck); /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00181.html (11,393 bytes)
23. RE: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: "Gordie's Garage" <mg_garage@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:06:20 -0500; Yup, they are as evidenced by the number of SUV owners shopping for wagons, at least at my store...Audi, who have been selling hot rod wagons (Avant's) and normal ones for years. Gordie /// or try ht; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00182.html (9,576 bytes)
24. Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 15:53:58 -0800; You are looking at it through the prism of "the government can't tell me what's best for me". True as far as it goes, but to take an example from early in the last century: most mass-produced bakery; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00183.html (11,905 bytes)
25. RE: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: "Jay Call" <jaycall@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 17:01:37 -0800; I'm looking at it through the prism of "the government can't (and I mean "can't," not "shouldn't," or "may not") tell ANY of us what's best for each of us," and even if it could, it's unnecessary, a; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00186.html (14,618 bytes)
26. Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: "Paul T. Root" <proot@horton.iaces.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:07:44 -0600; Ok, sorry, I'm off topic, WAY off topic. Ok, let's see if I can remember it. I leased it in the fall of '93, Labor Day to be exact. We traded it in in June of '98. It had somewhere around 50k miles.; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00187.html (11,567 bytes)
27. Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: "Parker, Richard" <RParker@csuchico.edu>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 08:13:31 -0800; I get the digest, so sometimes a thread goes a long way before I see any of it. And I should also say that I'm in a great hurry this morning and can't begin to say the things that come to mind after; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00195.html (9,248 bytes)
28. Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:09:01 -0800 (PST); Max Heim SEZ - Hey, we're in complete agreement! :-) -- David Breneman | And on the tree a star, Distributed Systems S/W Analyst | Of shiny Christmas gold. Airborne Express, Inc. | A candle in a jar; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00207.html (8,509 bytes)
29. Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:18:04 -0800; Thanks for your support <g>. But I'm determined to shut up on this thread, as it is definitely off-topic, and I think I made my general views known. <g> -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near; /html/mgs/2002-12/msg00225.html (9,460 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]