mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense

To: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Manufacturer's Profits at Buyer's Expense
From: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:18:04 -0800
Thanks for your support <g>. But I'm determined to shut up on this thread,
as it is definitely off-topic, and I think I made my general views known.
<g>
--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the primer red one with chrome wires


on 12/7/02 8:13 AM, Parker, Richard at RParker@csuchico.edu wrote:

> Max,
> I get the digest, so sometimes a thread goes a long way before I see any of
> it.  And I should also say that I'm in a great hurry this morning and can't
> begin to say the things that come to mind after reading the contributions on
> this very interesting and very important (if off-subject) topic.
> 
> But you are by no means alone in your views.  I have taught social and
> political philosophy for thirty years, including courses in a university
> college of business.  My best friend is a professor of finance and marketing.
> And I know as much about markets and such as most folks.  And the idea that
> they are somehow magical and deregulation the key to a better society (whether
> the market is for cars or mail or airport screeners) has become an article of
> faith, not of reason, among a huge chunk of the population.  This view, howeve
> superficailly attractive, doesn't hold up.  And the people who run major
> corporations know this better than anybody.  They do, however, depend on an
> awful lot of other people believing it.
> 
> More, when I'm back from Spain, unless the admin shuts this down.  :>)
> Richard

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>