Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'71\s+or\s+\'72\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\'71\s+or\s+\'72\?\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re[3]: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: joseph_cianciotti@ccmail_gw.gmosf.com; Date: Sun, 01 Sep 96 12:08:47 PST; You are correct. My humble apologies. Just for the record, a split bumper makes it a '70. I own an early 70 MGB with the split bumper. Does your car have a split rear bumper? If it does, and memory s; /html/mgs/1996-09/msg00058.html (8,632 bytes)
2. '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:34:29 -0400; Okay, I'm confused... :) If my car was MADE in 1971, as the serial # plate says, should I refer to it as a '71, or a '72?? My local MG guy insists on calling the car a '72, as that was the year it wa; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01061.html (7,253 bytes)
3. Re: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: "MIKE_J2@SFOV1.VERIFONE.COM" <MIKE_J2@sfov1.verifone.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 15:46:30 -1000; Depends. If your car is a transitional one, built during a transition period, then go by the VIN numbers. If your car was built in the middle of a production run then pick a year. Look in the Moss a; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01062.html (7,793 bytes)
4. Re: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 23:33:59 -0400; Well, maybe I didn't word that correctly. He calls it a '72. I saw the VIN and questioned him. He just kinda shrugged and said, "Whatever." You just have to know the guy. He knows his stuff, but I ge; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01070.html (7,544 bytes)
5. Re: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: joseph_cianciotti@ccmail_gw.gmosf.com; Date: Wed, 28 Aug 96 17:25:32 PST; Does your car have a split rear bumper? If it does, and memory serves me, then it's a '71. In California there are lots of pull handle '66's, because that's the year in which they were sold. By that; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01090.html (9,759 bytes)
6. re: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 13:36:30 -0400; Hold it! Sorry to fill your in-boxes, but this is kind of curious... The VIN (which, to the best of my knowledge, is accurate) says 5/72. The title says it's a '72. From what most of you have told me; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01093.html (7,294 bytes)
7. re: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 09:19:14 -0400; Okay, *now* I'll be putting my foot in my mouth, and cowering in shame... :( I'm terrribly sorry I troubled you all about this, but I've made a blunder: I finally went out to check the VIN # on my ca; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01128.html (7,352 bytes)
8. Re[2]: '71 or '72?? (score: 1): Author: Michael.Lytton@sierra.com; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 96 16:15:23 PST; Just for the record, a split bumper makes it a '70. I own an early 70 MGB with the split bumper. Michael Lytton 1970 MGB michael.lytton@sierra.com Does your car have a split rear bumper? If it does,; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg01161.html (7,158 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]