Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clutch\s+Cable\s+VS\s+Clutch\s+Rod\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clutch\s+Cable\s+VS\s+Clutch\s+Rod\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Clutch Cable VS Clutch Rod (score: 1): Author: BobMGT@aol.com; Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 00:41:34 EDT; Bob: I ordered a cable assembly. This is correct for my early TD anyway. I like the idea that engine movement won't affect the clutch engagement with the cable. With the rod (before I put in new engi; /html/mg-t/2000-05/msg00085.html (7,056 bytes)
2. Re: Clutch Cable VS Clutch Rod (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 00:02:05 -0700; I have a late TD with the clutch rod. I also rebuilt another early 52 TD with the rod set up. I have never had any problem with the clutch take up when everything was in good condition and installed; /html/mg-t/2000-05/msg00086.html (6,948 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]