Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Crown\s+wheel\s+\&\s+Pinion\s+\:\s+7\/37\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Crown\s+wheel\s+\&\s+Pinion\s+\:\s+7\/37\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Crown wheel & Pinion : 7/37 (score: 1): Author: "J.E.A.Rich" <mmmbob@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:31:53 -0700; I have been working on a friend's PA M.G. It has been fitted with a 7/37 CWP which is not the original ratio and I'm interested in learning from whence it came. There are no obvious markings on the d; /html/mg-mmm/2003-04/msg00000.html (7,469 bytes)
2. Re: Crown wheel & Pinion : 7/37 (score: 1): Author: <hiro@octagongarage.com>; Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:18:31 +0900; 7:37 should come from TA I think. This CWP was (is?) widely available, I still have 2 sets in my s/h stock. The ratio 5.285 is 1.7% higher than original 8:43(5.375) CWP. Almost same. Hiro 7/37 CWP w; /html/mg-mmm/2003-04/msg00001.html (8,067 bytes)
3. Re: Crown wheel & Pinion : 7/37 (score: 1): Author: "Pete and Fran Thelander" <pthelander@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:05:05 -0800; Hiro, Bob, et al, I had A 7/37 in the NE for a bit. It didn't last long. But it certainly is not TA. The TA had 8/39 and is about a quarter of an inch larger in diameter on the crown wheel. It works; /html/mg-mmm/2003-04/msg00002.html (9,845 bytes)
4. Re: Crown wheel & Pinion : 7/37 (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Fock" <awfock@optushome.com.au>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:48:09 +1000; Just to add to the confusion, I have a 7/36 in my PA, but I think that it's out of a YA (not TA). Apparently several pre-war cars down under are running with these diffs, brings the ratio up a bit an; /html/mg-mmm/2003-04/msg00003.html (9,388 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]